Introduction To quantify the within-build agreement of linear dimensions and slot-wall angulation of custom orthodontic brackets fabricated by LCD-masked vat photopolymerization with their nominal computer-aided design (CAD) targets. Methods Fifty brackets were fabricated in one build by one operator using a zirconia nanohybrid photopolymer resin (Rodin Sculpture 2.0). Two examiners measured four outcomes using ImageJ and Geomagic Control X, with three repetitions per examiner and program. Only the 12-reading mean for each specimen and outcome was retained. Means, standard deviations (SDs), confidence intervals (CIs), and conformity with investigator-defined margins (±0.05 mm and ±0.35°) were summarized. These margins were not validated clinical thresholds. The brackets were technical replicates of one build; measurement reliability and between-build reproducibility could not be estimated. Results The 50 consolidated specimen-level values yielded means (SDs) of 0.557 (0.015) mm for slot height, 0.711 (0.017) mm for slot depth, 0.999 (0.006) mm for base height, and 7.032° (0.174°) for slot-wall angulation. The corresponding 95% CIs were 0.552–0.561 mm, 0.706–0.716 mm, 0.997–1.000 mm, and 6.982°–7.081°. Specimen-level conformity with the investigator-defined limits was 94%, 94%, 100%, and 96%, respectively. Conclusions In this single build completed by one operator, mean linear dimensions and slot-wall angulation were close to the CAD targets. The results describe geometric agreement of averaged measurements within that build; they do not establish measurement reliability, workflow reproducibility, or clinical material suitability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Allison et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: