This paper presents a forecast-plan/actual-replay energy management framework for a photovoltaic-integrated hybrid uninterruptible power supply. A day-ahead schedule is generated from forecasts and replayed using realized profiles. The formulation accounts for converter losses, LiFePO4 battery degradation, reserve requirements, and terminal stored-energy constraints. Economic comparisons require terminal inventory comparability and critical validation compliance. Ten baseline 24 h scenarios cover positive and negative prices, photovoltaic forecast error, alternative objectives, and unannounced outages. Five additional cases examine prescribed PV overprediction and underprediction. Relative to a terminal-comparable grid-first UPS, system-level selected-objective cost reductions reached 15.818% in the positive-price PV case and 31.010% in the PV-rich outage case; these values do not isolate predictive scheduling or GA effects. In the five additional cases, selected-objective differences ranged from a 0.673% reduction to a 1.232% increase, despite preserved feasibility and complete load service in the primary runs. Null and control cases showed no artificial cycling. The non-compliant baseline case and additional diagnostic runs were excluded from economic inference. The results demonstrate traceable, validation-gated comparisons while showing that maintained operational feasibility does not guarantee an economic advantage under PV forecast mismatch.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Boros et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: