Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Study assessing economic viability of PV-storage in industrial parks, suggesting significant cost reductions.
With the large-scale deployment of distributed photovoltaics (PVs) on the user side, integrated PV-storage systems have become a critical means to reduce electricity costs and enhance energy flexibility. However, the volatility of PV output and the dynamic nature of time-of-use (TOU) pricing render the economic viability of such systems highly dependent on the coordinated optimization of capacity configuration and operational strategies. To address this, a bi-level optimization model is developed. The upper level maximizes the equivalent annual economic benefit by determining the installed capacities of PV and storage, explicitly incorporating power-sensitive operation and maintenance costs. The lower level, formulated as a mixed-integer programming problem, minimizes the daily net electricity cost by optimizing charging/discharging schedules and grid interaction. The model is solved through an iterative hierarchical approach combining the chaotic sparrow search algorithm (CSSA) and the CPLEX solver. A case study using actual data from an industrial park demonstrates that, compared with scenarios without PV-storage and with PV only, the joint PV-storage configuration reduces total electricity costs by 17.3% and 4.5%, respectively. Furthermore, the asymmetric impacts of PV forecast errors on operational economics are quantitatively analyzed: when PV output is underestimated, the failure to pre-reserve accommodation capacity leads to an increase in electricity procurement costs of RMB 1927.84 compared with the ideal scenario. To mitigate this, a risk-aware fault-tolerant scheduling strategy is proposed, which reserves a 5% accommodation margin through conservative biasing, reducing the additional cost caused by forecast errors by 20.14% and significantly enhancing the system’s economic robustness under forecast uncertainty.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: