Existing fault identification methods still face problems such as insufficient lightweight design, inadequate multi-scale feature representation capability, and difficulty in model training under small-sample conditions, making it difficult to meet the requirements of oilfield production sites. For the dynamometer-card-based fault identification task of the sucker rod pumping system, this paper makes targeted improvements to MobileNetV2 and a lightweight fault identification method based on transfer learning and improved MobileNetV2 is proposed. The method uses MobileNetV2 as its basic framework, improves the activation function, and introduces a multi-scale feature extraction module and an attention mechanism, thereby improving the model’s identification capability while maintaining a lightweight design. Experiments were carried out using a constructed dynamometer card dataset based on competition data and measured oilfield data. The proposed method was compared with representative deep learning methods, and a cross-source external validation experiment was further conducted using independently measured oilfield samples. The results show that the improved MobileNetV2 achieved a mean accuracy of 95.01%, with a standard deviation of 0.09%, 2.28 M parameters, a model size of 9.01 MB, 536.72 M MACs, and a CPU inference latency of 29.62 ms per image. In terms of mean accuracy, the improved MobileNetV2 outperforms EfficientNetV2, ResNet34, DenseNet121, MobileNetV3, ShuffleNetV2, and the original MobileNetV2, while achieving a mean accuracy of 90.16% on the cross-source external validation set. This method achieves a relatively good balance between identification performance and model complexity on the dataset used in this study, and it can provide a useful lightweight model reference for dynamometer-card-based fault identification in a sucker rod pumping system.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sun et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: