Developing countries face critical tensions between farmland-use policies prioritizing food security and environmental sustainability, and farmers’ livelihood-centered land-use strategies. To address these challenges, this study develops a human-centered agent-based model that integrates dual-layer Q-learning with GIS-based spatial representation. This framework simulates farmers’ adaptive decision-making under dynamic policy and environmental conditions while formalizing behavioral heterogeneity through Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB)-informed typologies. Agents dynamically evolve land-transfer and cropping strategies via perception–action–feedback learning cycles. Applied to and validated against empirical observations from a representative Chinese case, the model reveals non-linear scale–efficiency relationships, with medium-scale farms exhibiting the comparatively balanced performance across yield and multiple resource-use efficiency dimensions. The analysis further identifies evolutionary pathways of adaptive behavior under policy incentives and quantifies trade-offs among area-weighted crop output, resource-use efficiency, and regional gross income. Scenario simulations show that rice-oriented subsidies increase rice output but reduce resource-use efficiency, rapeseed output, and gross income, whereas rotation-oriented incentives increase gross income while maintaining rice output near the baseline level. These findings support performance-linked subsidies based on multidimensional outcomes, tiered land-transfer regulation, and diversified cropping incentives. By linking adaptive behavioral dynamics with spatial and institutional constraints, this study provides a robust analytical framework for evaluating land-use policies and supports more effective governance strategies for balancing food security, environmental sustainability, and rural livelihoods.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xiaoxing et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: