Background Preterm neonates are disproportionately affected by iatrogenic anaemia from frequent phlebotomy for laboratory monitoring. In high-volume neonatal units managing critically ill preterm neonates, minimising blood loss without compromising clinical monitoring is an important goal. Non-invasive haemoglobin (SpHb) monitoring using pulse CO-oximetry offers a potential strategy to reduce unnecessary invasive sampling. Methods A prospective observational study was conducted in 300 preterm neonates (<37 weeks gestational age) admitted to a tertiary care neonatal intensive care unit in India over 4 months. SpHb was measured using the Masimo Rad-67 and paired with laboratory haemoglobin values (1,435 paired measurements). Agreement was assessed by Bland–Altman analysis; secondary outcomes included trending ability, anaemia detection, measurement accuracy and blood sampling burden. Results Mean bias was −0.002 g/dL (95% CI: −0.040 to +0.036 g/dL), the limits of agreement were −1.438 to +1.434 g/dL, the percentage error was 9.51%, and the intraclass correlation coefficient (2,1) was 0.939 (excellent agreement). Four-quadrant concordance was 91.2% (961 evaluable pairs). The receiver operating characteristic area under the curve was 0.975 (95% CI: 0.950-0.999); at SpHb <13.3 g/dL, sensitivity was 98.7% and negative predictive value was 99.9%. Clinical sepsis was the only independent predictor of significant measurement error (adjusted OR 7.07, 95% CI: 4.62-10.80, P < .001). The median blood volume drawn was 8.2 mL (7.9% of estimated blood volume). Conclusions SpHb demonstrated clinically acceptable agreement with laboratory haemoglobin across a large prospective cohort of preterm neonates. Trending ability and anaemia detection performance were robust. SpHb may serve as a useful adjunct to help reduce unnecessary invasive sampling in clinically stable neonates, with caution advised in the presence of sepsis or haemodynamic instability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
C. et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: