This study presents a bibliometric mapping of sustainable business model innovation (SBMI) research, analysing 961 Scopus‐indexed documents (2016–2025) retrieved via a title‐field Boolean query and a four‐stage screening protocol. Circular, regenerative, and resilient business models are treated as distinct, related perspectives rather than sequential stages. The corpus shows a three‐phase growth trajectory: emergence, acceleration, and consolidation, with an overall compound annual growth rate of 24.5%. Knowledge production concentrates in European institutions, led by Sweden, the UK, and Italy, anchored by Lund University. Co‐citation (four clusters) and keyword co‐occurrence (five clusters) analyses reveal a field anchored in Osterwalder and Pigneur's business model canvas. The regenerative perspective remains bibliometrically marginal, appearing as an author keyword in only 2 of 961 documents. The study clarifies the boundaries separating these perspectives and proposes a structured research agenda, positioning regeneration as an emerging, not accomplished, frontier for sustainable business model innovation scholarship.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fetah et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: