Federated learning (FL) trains models across geographically dispersed clients whose electricity carries very different carbon intensities. We present FedGreenCS, a carbon-aware approach to FL for IoT and next-generation networks. Clients are first grouped by data distribution similarity, using pairwise cosine similarity of model weights after a single local epoch. In each subsequent round, a sampled client whose carbon intensity exceeds a fixed tolerance offloads its training to the lowest-carbon available peer in its similarity cluster, while clients within the tolerance participate unchanged. Ordered dropout gives clients with a higher carbon intensity a narrower model. We derive a carbon cost model that separates computation and communication for each client and round, isolates the cost of the mandatory first-round broadcast, and states the design over the scaling rates and the tolerance. On a non-IID EMNIST partition with real regional carbon intensities, FedGreenCS with three carbon clusters reaches 70% test accuracy at 3.15 to 3.36 g CO2 of client-side carbon cost over three seeds, against 3.58 g for FedGreen and 15.12 g for FedAvg. With one model width for all clients, the offloading cuts this cost by 23% to 58%, but it raises the cost with two carbon clusters and always needs more rounds.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bao et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: