The role of macro-institutional factors in shaping entrepreneurial outcomes is increasingly receiving scholarly attention. Yet, most existing studies often adopt a restricted approach that overwhelmingly treats institutional voids as constraints. This study fills this gap by analysing the mechanism through which institutional voids influence eco-innovation, as well as the conditions under which this mechanism is more effective. Using a sample of 9867 small and medium-sized enterprises from 13 emerging economies, we find support for the dual role of institutional voids. Specifically, institutional voids are not just constraining factors; they also stimulate green strategic orientations (GSO), which in turn promote eco-innovation efforts. Furthermore, we find that international exposure enhances this mechanism, as export firms have higher levels of GSO and eco-innovation outcomes. Our findings contribute to entrepreneurship literature by revealing that GSOs are not mere background conditions, but essential organisational levers that allow eco-innovating firms to succeed in weak institutional settings. These findings are crucial for managers and policymakers seeking to improve the productivity and sustainability efforts of emerging economy firms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Edeh et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: