The in silico and in vitro antifungal activities of a series of bis(cycloalkylsulfenyl)-1,3,4-thiadiazole derivatives were evaluated against Candida albicans (C. albicans) and Aspergillus niger (A. niger). Crystallographic analysis of 1,6-bis(2-cyclopentylsulfenyl-1,3,4-thiadiazole-5-sulfenyl)hexane (C5C6TD) in the monoclinic P21/n space group revealed coplanar 1,3,4-thiadiazole-2-sulfenyl rings and a hexamethylene spacer, with twist-envelope cyclopentyl conformations. In vitro MTT assays confirmed all derivatives were non-toxic to RAW 264.7 macrophages at the tested concentration range of 3.125-100 μg mL−1. In silico ADMET and ProTox-III predictions showed that carbon spacer length influenced pharmacokinetics and toxicity; six-carbon spacers were predicted to be class VI toxic, whereas four-carbon spacers were class IV. All derivatives demonstrated prominent in vitro antifungal efficacy, with minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) between 8 and 64 μg mL−1. Compound C5C6TD specifically exhibited MICs of 62.5 and 31.25 μg mL−1 against C. albicans and A. niger, respectively. Furthermore, computational docking analysis indicated robust binding pocket interactions with target proteins, showing excellent binding energies of −10.67 kcal mol−1 for lanosterol 14-alpha demethylase (PDB: 5V5Z) and −10.32 kcal mol−1 for glucose oxidase (PDB: 1GAL). These findings highlight the therapeutic potential of these thiadiazoles as safe, active antifungal agents.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Za’im et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: