Key result
Generic antihypertensive drugs achieved comparable long-term systolic blood pressure reductions (adjusted mean difference 0.9 mmHg) and cardiovascular outcomes compared to brand-name drugs, while being significantly more cost-effective.
Why the study?
Concerns remain regarding the effectiveness and safety of generic antihypertensive drugs due to small sample sizes and short follow-up in prior studies.
Cohort (n=7,955)
Yes
Mean Difference: 0.9 (95% CI -0.1–1.8)
Absolute Event Rate: -7.1% vs -7.9%
p-value: p=0.08
Supports generic substitution for cost savings in hypertension; leaves open definitive cardiovascular outcome equivalence pending randomized trials.
BACKGROUND: Generic drugs are bioequivalent to their brand-name counterparts; however, concerns still exist regarding the effectiveness and safety of generic drugs because of small sample sizes and short follow-up time in most studies. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term antihypertensive efficacy, cost-effectiveness and cardiovascular outcomes of generic drugs compared with brand-name drugs. METHODS: In a multicenter, community-based study including 7955 hypertensive patients who were prospectively followed up for an average of 2.5 years, we used the propensity-score-matching method to match the patients using brand-name drugs to those using generic drugs in a ratio of 1:2, 2176 patients using brand-name drugs and 4352 patients using generic drugs. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between generic drugs and brand-name drugs in blood pressure (BP)-lowering efficacy, BP control rate, and cardiovascular outcomes including coronary heart disease and stroke. The adjusted mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) of systolic BP (SBP)-lowering was -7.9 mmHg (95% CI, -9.9 to -5.9) in the brand-name drug group and -7.1 mmHg (95% CI, -9.1 to -5.1) in the generic drug group after adjusting for age, sex, body mass index, number of antihypertensive drugs and traditionally cardiovascular risk factors. Among patients aged <60 years, brand-name drugs had a higher BP control rate (47% vs. 41%; P = 0.02) and a greater effect in lowering SBP compared with generic drugs, with the between-group difference of 1.5 mmHg (95% CI, 0.2-2.8; P = 0.03). BP control rate was higher in male patients using brand-name drugs compared with those using generic drugs (46% vs. 40%; P = 0.01). Generic drugs treatment yielded an average annual incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $315.4 per patient per mmHg decrease in SBP compared with brand-name drugs treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggested that generic drugs are suitable and cost-effective in improving hypertension management and facilitating public health benefits, especially in low- and middle-income areas.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Hypertension (n=7,955). Generic antihypertensive drugs vs. Brand-name antihypertensive drugs was evaluated on Change in systolic blood pressure (SBP) (MD 0.9 mmHg, 95% CI -0.1 to 1.8, p=0.08). Generic antihypertensive drugs achieved comparable long-term systolic blood pressure reductions (adjusted mean difference 0.9 mmHg) and cardiovascular outcomes compared to brand-name drugs, while being significantly more cost-effective.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: