This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Background Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is dystrophin-deficiency skeletal and cardiac muscle disease. Protein post-translational modification (PTM) and aberrant immune cell activation play a key role in its pathogenesis. Objective Our study aims to investigate isonicotinylation (Kinic)-associated signature modulatory patterns in mast cells and DMD pathogenesis. Methods We first performed integrated bioinformatic methods, such as WGCNA, GSVA, and CIBERSORT to identify Kinic and mast cell (KM)-related differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in DMD patient muscle bulk profiles (GSE38417 and GSE109178). Next, consensus clustering and assembling machine learning pipeline identified KM-associated diagnostic model and molecular subgroups in training the DMD patient muscle bulk set (GSE6011), and then, diagnostic model performance was examined in the independent DMD patient muscle bulk set (GSE32720). In addition, SHAP analysis decoded the main contributor in KM-associated diagnostic model construction, and contributor molecular and immune characters in DMD were estimated in GSE6011 and the DMD mouse muscle single-cell transcriptomic dataset (GSE213925) assisted by computational virtual cells. In addition, the deep learning framework and network pharmacology identified the drug synergy strategy for the treatment of DMD. Finally, the in vitro assay identified expression patterns of the main contributor. Results KM-associated molecular patterns can potentially guide the diagnostic and molecular stratification for DMD patients. USP18 can be considered an upregulated and mast cell-distributed hub gene involved in pathogenesis of DMD. In addition, finafloxacin with BRD-K10482608 can be considered two potential therapeutic candidates for DMD patient clinical applications. Conclusion Our investigation described a novel forecasting and therapeutic model for DMD patients, which potentially enhances DMD patient clinical translation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: