This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Stevens notes that modern efforts quantify subjective magnitudes have led three types of scales-all three designed show how sensation grows as a function of stimulus-values.1 Categoryand discriminative scales have generally been shown be nonlinearly related magnitude-scales. Are we, it has been asked, to be left with a purely operational view, accepting different psychophysical laws for different scaling-methods? Is there any way bridge the gaps between the different kinds of scales? In the face of discrepancies like this, it is not so much a question of which is correct, but how reconcile the differences. Until we do, we have not
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Richard K. Eyman (1967) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: