Key result
Prior IV thrombolysis before mechanical thrombectomy for M2 occlusions linked to ~38% higher favorable functional outcome.
Why the study?
The influence of prior intravenous thrombolysis on outcomes in patients with M2 occlusions treated with mechanical thrombectomy was uncertain due to limited inclusion in prior trials.
Observational (n=1,132)
Yes
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports bridging intravenous thrombolysis for M2 occlusions; leaves open the need for randomized.
BACKGROUND: Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) for patients treated with mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for proximal occlusions has recently been questioned through randomized trials. However, few patients with M2 occlusions were included. We investigated the influence of prior IVT for patients presenting M2 occlusions treated with MT in comparison with MT alone. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of the Endovascular Treatment in Ischemic Stroke (ETIS) registry, a multicenter observational study. Data from consecutive patients treated with MT for M2 occlusions between January 2015 and January 2022 at 26 comprehensive stroke centers were analyzed. The primary endpoint was 90-day modified Rankin Scale score of 0-2. Outcomes were compared using propensity score approaches. We also performed sensitivity analysis in relevant subgroups of patients. RESULTS: Among 1132 patients with M2 occlusions treated with MT, 570 received prior IVT. The two groups were comparable after propensity analysis. The rate of favorable functional outcome was significantly higher in the IVT+MT group compared with the MT alone group (59.8% vs 44.7%; adjusted OR 1.38, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.75, P=0.008). Hemorrhagic and procedural complications were similar in both groups. In sensitivity analysis excluding patients with anticoagulation treatment, favorable recanalization was more frequent in the IVT+MT group (OR 1.37, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.70, P=0.004). CONCLUSIONS: In cases of M2 occlusions, prior IVT combined with MT resulted in better functional outcome than MT alone, without increasing the rate of hemorrhagic or procedural complications. These results suggest the benefit of IVT in patients undergoing MT for M2 occlusions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Floch et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Ischemic stroke with M2 occlusions (n=1,132). Prior intravenous thrombolysis vs. Mechanical thrombectomy alone was evaluated on 90-day modified Rankin Scale score of 0-2 (adjusted OR 1.38, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.75, p=0.008). Prior intravenous thrombolysis before mechanical thrombectomy for M2 occlusions improved 90-day favorable functional outcome compared to thrombectomy alone.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: