Key result
Higher left atrial spontaneous echo contrast intensity is linked to ~9% higher stroke risk in NVAF.
Why the study?
The intensity of left atrial spontaneous echo contrast (LASEC) has been proposed as an important variable for thromboembolic risk stratification in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), but its quantification to improve stroke prediction utility was not established.
Does the quantification of left atrial spontaneous echo contrast by video intensity predict subsequent stroke events in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation?
Cohort (n=206)
No
Does the quantification of left atrial spontaneous echo contrast by video intensity predict subsequent stroke events in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Quantifying left atrial spontaneous echo contrast severity via video intensity provides an objective echocardiographic measure that strongly predicts stroke risk, which may help identify candidates for anticoagulation among low-to-intermediate clinical risk NVAF patients.
The intensity of left atrial spontaneous echo contrast (LASEC) by transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) has been proposed as an important variable in the stratification of thromboembolic risk, particularly in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). We hypothesized that the quantification of LASEC by ultrasound will improve its utility in predicting subsequent stroke events in patients with NVAF. Patients (n = 206) with definite NVAF receiving TEE were included for this prospective cohort study. Baseline clinical risk factors of stroke, CHADS2 score and CHA2DS2-Vasc, left atrial thrombus (LAT), the five-grades of LASEC and video intensity (VI) value of LASEC were measured. During 2 years follow-up, 20 patients (9.7%) developed stroke. VI value of LASEC in the patients with stroke was higher compared to patients without stroke (25.30 ± 3.61 vs. 8.65 ± 0.81, p < 0.001). On logistic regression analysis, LAT, qualitative LASEC, graded LASEC, VI value of LASEC and CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-Vasc score were independent predictors of stroke. Among them, the highest area under the curve of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) in predicting stroke was VI value of LASEC (p < 0.05). These results show that quantification of LASEC by VI value is the most favorable predictor of stroke in patients with NVAF, and calls for improving the utility of LASEC in predicting subsequent stroke events.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhao et al. (2016) conducted a cohort in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation (n=206). Left atrial spontaneous echo contrast (LASEC) video intensity was evaluated on Incident stroke events (OR 1.09, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.15, p=0.002). Higher video intensity of left atrial spontaneous echo contrast was independently associated with an increased risk of stroke (OR 1.09) in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: