Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PURPOSE: Post-transplant functional lung surveillance relies on global ventilatory assessment using spirometry, lacking regional ventilation and perfusion measures. We aimed to assess early post-transplant lung function in clinically stable recipients using phase-resolved functional lung (PREFUL) MRI. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this prospective, single-center study (March 2022-December 2024), clinically stable bilateral lung transplant recipients and 1:1 age- (± 5 years) sex-matched participants (n = 100) underwent PREFUL MRI and spirometry. Ventilation and perfusion MRI was voxel-based quantified: Regional ventilation (RVent, [mL/mL]), flow-volume loop ventilation (FVL, [au]) and perfusion (Q, [mL/min/100 mL]). Whole lung defect maps (VDP, QDP [%]), V/Q ratios (%) based on RVent, FVL and Q were generated. Median MRI parameters were compared with controls, spirometry and perioperative data (Bonferroni correction P<.0045 considered significant). RESULTS: (14% vs 7.1%, P < 0.001) and QDP (7.9% vs 2.4%, P < 0.001). In transplant recipients FVL, FVL VDP, QDP and V/Q matched defects correlated with spirometry. QDP was associated with prolonged cold ischemic times of first lung allografts (ρ = 0.43, P = 0.004), V/Q mismatch with cold ischemic times of first and second implanted lungs (ρ = 0.48, P = 0.001; ρ = 0.46, P = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Free-breathing phase-resolved functional lung MRI-derived parameters revealed increased regional ventilation and perfusion heterogeneity in stable lung transplant recipients two weeks post-transplantation and correlated with spirometry and prolonged cold ischemic times of allografts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Heinze et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: