This study evaluated a retrieval-augmented, multi-agent large language model (LLM)–driven, human-in-the-loop framework for detecting cutaneous immune-related adverse events (cirAEs) from clinical notes. Compared with the unassisted manual-review group, the LLM-assisted group demonstrated higher accuracy (F1 = 0.88 vs 0.77) and inter-rater agreement measured by Cohen’s κ ( κ = 0.82 vs 0.50), and reported an approximately one-third shorter average review time. This framework pilots how LLMs can be applied to identify immune-related toxicities and, more broadly, support accurate, scalable, and transparent adverse event data extraction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: