This article examines the theoretical, structural, and cognitive-pragmatic aspects of legal terms within world linguistics. It analyzes the historical evolution of legal terminology from Roman law to modern forensic linguistics, detailing its semantic boundaries, polysemy, synonymy, and lexicographic codification. Furthermore, the paper highlights modern corpus-based approaches and natural language processing applications in legal discourse.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sheraliyevna et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: