Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) rapidly triggers perihematomal neuroinflammation and secondary brain injury, yet the intercellular mechanisms governing immune cell recruitment and actionable therapeutic targets remain incompletely understood. We performed single-cell RNA sequencing and cell–cell communication analyses on human perihematomal brain tissues, complemented by immunofluorescence for spatial validation. Based on these findings, we evaluated the therapeutic effects of pharmacological MAC-1 activation using LA-1 in mouse models of ICH and LPS-induced neuroinflammation. In parallel, macrophage functional assays, transcriptomic profiling, and mechanistic studies were performed to investigate the cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying MAC-1 activation. Human single-cell analyses revealed profound remodeling of endothelial-immune communication in the ICH microenvironment, characterized by enhanced ICAM1-ITGAM/ITGB2 (MAC-1)-dependent signaling. Spatial analyses confirmed close association between CD11b + myeloid cells and ICAM1-enriched vascular structures. In vivo, pharmacological activation of MAC-1 reduced neuroinflammation and immune cell infiltration, promoted hematoma resolution, and improved neurological outcomes after ICH, findings that were further validated in an LPS-induced neuroinflammation model. In vitro, MAC-1 activation enhanced macrophage-endothelial adhesion while suppressing macrophage migration and inflammatory activation, accompanied by broad inhibition of inflammatory and chemotactic transcriptional programs. Mechanistically, Dusp1 was identified as a potential downstream mediator linking MAC-1 activation to transcriptional reprogramming and reduced immune cell recruitment. MAC-1-dependent endothelial-immune interactions represent an important regulatory mechanism underlying neuroinflammation after ICH. Therapeutic activation of MAC-1 attenuates inflammatory amplification and immune cell recruitment, establishing MAC-1 as a therapeutically actionable target for limiting secondary brain injury after ICH.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Du et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: