Selective hydrogenation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons is vital for fuel upgrading and hydrogen-donor solvent synthesis, whereas precise regulation between partial and deep hydrogenation pathways remains a long-standing challenge. Herein, Al 2 O 3 -supported Ni 2 P and MoP catalysts with identical nominal loading were fabricated via a spatially confined phosphorization route and comparatively investigated for naphthalene hydrogenation. Under identical conditions (320 °C, 4 MPa H 2 ), Ni 2 P /Al 2 O 3 preferentially catalyzed deep hydrogenation: it delivered 92.8 % naphthalene conversion with 89.7 % selectivity toward decalin. By contrast, MoP/Al 2 O 3 dominated partial saturation, affording 90.6 % naphthalene conversion and 94.9 % tetralin selectivity. Apparent kinetic measurements revealed close activation energies for initial naphthalene consumption over the two catalysts (61.16 and 65.36 kJ mol −1 , reflecting similar activity for the first-ring hydrogenation. Nevertheless, the activation energy for subsequent tetralin hydrogenation differed markedly, reaching 91.59 kJ mol −1 on MoP/Al 2 O 3 versus 66.44 kJ mol −1 on Ni 2 P/Al 2 O 3 . Consistently, DFT calculations confirmed similar energy barriers for naphthalene conversion to tetralin on Ni 2 P(0 0 1) and MoP(1 0 1), while MoP(1 0 1) possessed significantly elevated energy barriers for late-stage hydrogenation. Combined experimental and theoretical evidence identifies secondary hydrogenation of tetralin as the selectivity-determining step. This work offers clear mechanistic insights into tuning the formation of tetralin and decalin over transition metal phosphide catalysts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: