Aging is associated with reduced gait efficiency, particularly during simultaneous activities. These situations, commonly referred to as dual-task walking, are frequent in everyday life and require the concurrent allocation of motor and cognitive resources. Although dual-tasking is known to affect mobility, the relative effects of motor and cognitive demands on gait performance remain unclear. This study investigated the effects of motor (weight-carrying) and cognitive (semantic verbal fluency) dual-task conditions on gait performance in young and older adults. A total of 164 participants ( n = 82 young and n = 82 older adults) completed a standardized walking protocol under three conditions: single-task, motor dual-task, and cognitive dual-task walking. Wearable motion sensors were used to assess the stride length, cadence, gait speed, and foot-strike angle. Between-group and within-group comparisons were performed using the Mann–Whitney U and Friedman tests, respectively. Significance was set at 5%. Gait parameters differed between older and young adults across all experimental conditions ( p < 0.001 for all comparisons). The semantic verbal-fluency condition produced larger changes in gait performance than the weight-carrying condition. The cognitive dual-task cost was 4.3% in young adults and 7.1% in older adults. Motor dual-tasking did not affect gait performance in young adults, whereas older adults completed the walking course in less time, resulting in a negative dual-task cost of − 4.6%. Under the specific experimental conditions, the semantic verbal fluency produced larger changes in gait performance than the weight carrying in both age groups. Responses to the motor dual-task were characterized by stable gait performance in young adults and shorter course completion time in older adults. From a public health perspective, incorporating dual-task conditions into gait assessments may help identify age-related functional vulnerabilities and inform strategies to promote safe mobility and preserve functional independence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sobrinho et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: