Findings on the teacher belief–practice relationship are mixed and highly context-dependent. In gifted education, direct evidence is limited and inconsistent across study designs and settings, especially in regions where gifted education is still underdeveloped. In this study, a structural equation model was applied to analyze the relationship between teachers’ general beliefs about gifted education and young gifted children and their self-reported practices for supporting them in the context of early childhood education in China, among 202 general early childhood teachers. Exploratory factor analysis yielded a two-factor structure (“adaptive” and “extension”) for measuring teachers’ self-reported practices. Structural model results indicated that teachers’ beliefs were positively associated with both “adaptive” ( β = .44, p < .001) and “extension” practices ( β = .38, p < .001). Stronger beliefs were associated with more frequent self-reported use of practices for supporting young gifted children. The article also discusses practical implications for professional development and policymaking.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fangfang Cai (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: