Background: Long-term maintenance of breast shape after reduction mammaplasty remains challenging, with inferior pole descent and pseudoptosis as possible late complications. The Modified Liacyr-Ribeiro Technique incorporates an inferior lipo-glandular flap fixed to the chest wall, functioning as an autologous prosthesis to improve internal support. Objective data beyond a decade remain scarce. This study evaluates long-term (>10 years) patient-reported and structural outcomes after the Modified Liacyr-Ribeiro Technique. Methods: A single-center retrospective cohort with prospective follow-up assessment was conducted. Eighty-six patients undergoing bilateral reduction mammaplasty with our technique between 2010 and 2015 were included (mean follow-up of 14 years). Outcomes included patient-reported satisfaction and symptom relief, objective anthropometric measurements, surgeon clinical assessment, and blinded panel-based photographic evaluation. Multivariable regression analysis were used to identify predictors of long-term satisfaction. Results: Overall, long-term satisfaction was high (mean score 4.48/5), with 86.0% of patients reporting high satisfaction. Objective clinical evaluation demonstrated stable breast shape, with adequate upper pole projection in 95.7% and correct nipple position in 97.8%. No cases of pseudoptosis were reported clinically. Blinded photographic assessment confirmed a very low prevalence of pseudoptosis (1%). Age, menopausal status, pregnancy, and postoperative weight variations – including extreme changes requiring bariatric surgery – did not negatively impact long-term satisfaction or structural outcomes. Conclusions: The Modified Liacyr-Ribeiro Technique provides durable structural support and sustained patient satisfaction over more than a decade of follow-up, supporting the autologous prosthesis concept as an effective strategy to preserve breast shape and prevent inferior pole descent, largely independent of major physiological stressors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Matias et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: