This paper examines how business entertainment expenses (BEEs), often regarded as grease money, affect corporate innovation. Using hand-collected BEE data from Chinese listed firms’ annual reports, we construct a panel of 30,353 firm-year observations over 2010–2022. Poisson regressions show that a 0.1-percentage-point increase in BEEs relative to sales is associated with 0.46% and 0.54% increases in patent applications and grants, respectively. To identify the effects of anti-corruption enforcement on innovation, we exploit China’s 2012 anti-corruption campaign in a difference-in-differences design, comparing firms with high and low pre-campaign BEE intensity in a balanced panel of 1,075 firms covering 2010–2015. Following the campaign, patent applications and grants fall by 26% and 21%, respectively, among high-BEE firms relative to low-BEE firms. Low-BEE firms benefit from positive spillovers arising from the reallocation of government subsidies, while social trust and public scrutiny strengthen the campaign’s disciplining effect on high-BEE firms. These findings highlight the dual effects of anti-corruption enforcement on innovation: disrupting the exchange of BEEs for favours constrains innovation among corruption-dependent firms, while fairer resource allocation benefits firms that are less dependent on such exchanges.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: