Febrile seizures (FS) are the most common neurological emergency in young children, yet why only a minority of febrile children develop seizures remains unclear; differences may lie in brain structure, peripheral physiology, or their multivariate association. In this retrospective case–control study, 274 children aged 2–6 years underwent brain MRI and laboratory testing (febrile controls [FC] n = 68; simple FS n = 165; complex FS n = 41). Hippocampal head, body, and tail asymmetry indices were derived, and 36 laboratory markers were reduced to five components (inflammation, coagulation, immunity, metabolic/hepatorenal, blood cells). Univariate comparisons used general linear models with age and sex, with false-discovery-rate (FDR) control within domain. Canonical correlation analysis (CCA) linked component scores with asymmetry indices; the between-group difference in the first canonical correlation (Δr1) was permutation-tested. Peak temperature did not differ between groups. 9 of 36 markers differed after FDR correction, including C-reactive protein, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, IgA, IgG, IgM, uric acid, red-cell count, lymphocytes, and eosinophils. No hippocampal asymmetry index differed. The first canonical correlation was significant in both FS (r1 = 0.325, P = 0.044) and FC (r1 = 0.527, P = 0.032) without between-group difference. Loadings differed: in FS, immunity and blood-cell components coupled with tail–body asymmetry; in FC, blood-cell and metabolic components coupled with tail asymmetry. Out-of-sample validation substantially attenuated this association in FS, indicating the FS association was less stable. Children with FS showed a distinct peripheral laboratory profile relative to febrile controls. A laboratory–hippocampal multivariate association emerged in both febrile groups with group-specific coupling patterns; its lower replicability in FS warrants cautious interpretation. These findings delineate the peripheral context of typical FS and inform future studies of seizure susceptibility.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: