Electroencephalography (EEG) provides a promising physiological modality for biometric authentication due to its inherent neural uniqueness and resistance to spoofing attacks. However, reliable EEG-based authentication remains challenging because brain signals are highly non-stationary and vary across cognitive states. To address this limitation, this study proposes a multi-paradigm neurophysiological measurement protocol designed to capture stable subject-specific EEG signatures across diverse brain conditions. EEG signals were recorded from participants during six complementary paradigms, including eyes-open and eyes-closed resting states, left and right-hand motor tasks, working-memory encoding, steady-state visual evoked potentials (SSVEP), and steady-state auditory evoked potentials (SSAEP). The recorded signals were preprocessed and segmented into 2-s epochs with 50% overlap. We extracted 28 quantitative descriptors per channel from time, frequency, time-frequency, and nonlinear domains. These descriptors were used to evaluate several decision models, including Mahalanobis distance-based template matching, logistic regression (LR), support vector machine, random forest, and a one-dimensional convolutional neural network. The performance of the proposed measurement system was analyzed under both single-paradigm and multi-paradigm configurations using cross-session validation. Experimental results show that the multi-paradigm measurement protocol reduces the equal error rate (EER) by 2% compared with single-paradigm systems. The LR decision model achieved the best performance with an EER of 1.6% (95% confidence interval: 1.48−1.73), with false rejection rates of 2.06% and 9.01% at false acceptance rates of 1% and 0.1%, respectively. Feature analysis indicated that Hjorth mobility and Mel-frequency cepstral coefficients derived from fronto-central cortical channels provide the most reliable neural identity descriptors. These results demonstrate that multi-paradigm EEG acquisition improves the stability of neural measurements across cognitive states and enables reliable biometric authentication in dynamic conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rakshe et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: