Arctic tundra and boreal forest landscapes exhibit substantial microclimatic temperature variability, driven by strong topographic gradients, heterogeneous snowmelt patterns, and contrasting vegetation structures. However, this fine-scale variability is often poorly represented in reanalyses, climate models, and conventional weather station networks. In this study, we use a total of 347 microclimate loggers deployed across three regions in northern Fennoscandia during 2020–2024 to examine how the onset, end, duration, and degree days of the growing season vary across the landscapes. Our results show pronounced spatial variation in the onset of the growing season, particularly in the tundra environments, where the earliest and latest onsets differed by up to 40 days within the same season. In contrast, the end of the growing season showed less spatial variability and often occurred nearly simultaneously at the three regions, likely reflecting the changes in large-scale weather conditions. Consequently, the spatial variability in growing season length was primarily driven by differences in its onset, which were largely associated with spatial variations in snowmelt timing. Growing degree sums also varied markedly within areas, with differences of about 400 °C days between the warmest and coldest places. The exceptionally warm summer of 2024 corresponded to conditions normally experienced several hundred kilometres further south, highlighting the unprecedented nature of this anomalous summer in northern ecosystems. The findings of this study demonstrate the value of dense microclimate observation networks for advancing our understanding of microclimatic processes at ecological scales in cold ecosystems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rantanen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: