Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The electrochemical oxidation of biomass‐derived alcohols and aldehydes to produce high‐value carboxylic acids is a more sustainable strategy for achieving biomass upgrading. However, traditional metal oxyhydroxide (MOOH) catalysts suffer from inefficient M 2+ /M δ+ (δ≥ 3) cycling. Herein, we report a novel ZrO x ─MOOH interfacial synergy in electrocatalytic reaction, achieved by modifying traditional MOOH materials with ZrO x as a dynamic electronic regulator for efficient oxidation of alcohols and aldehydes. The ZrO 2 clusters are reduced to lower‐valent suboxides (ZrO x ) during the Ni 2+ →Ni 3+ process. The formed ZrO x enhances the adsorption of the 5‐hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF) (aldehyde C─O) and OH − , and enables faster charge transfer with more NiOOH species participating in the Ni 2+ /Ni 3+ redox by modulating the charge density on Ni. The ZrO x ─NiOOH‐catalyzed HER//HMFOR process achieves stable 2,5‐furandicarboxylic acid (FDCA) yield and Faradaic efficiency (>95%) over 24 consecutive electrolytic cycles. When applied to a flowing HMFOR system (∼1 A/cm 2 , 1.50 V, 200 mM), the overall FDCA yield reaches 90%. Technical‐economic analysis (TEA) demonstrates the economic viability of the system. This work reveals biphasic evolution behavior of catalyst interface, providing a new design paradigm for electrocatalysts in the efficient upgrading of alcohols and aldehydes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yuan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: