Driven by the dual-carbon strategy, accurate personalized energy consumption estimation of battery electric vehicles (BEVs) is a core demand of intelligent transportation. Differentiated long-term driving styles lead to 20–30% energy consumption differences under identical road environments, which cannot be captured by traditional prediction models. Current mainstream physical and data-driven modeling methods suffer prominent technical limitations: they only extract instantaneous driving features without mining stable latent driving preferences and adopt fixed-parameter transfer strategies that fail to eliminate distribution bias for long-tail users with few historical trips. To address these bottlenecks, this paper first establishes standardized mathematical definitions for road networks, trajectories, and trip datasets, quantifies seven energy-sensitive driving events via statistical thresholds, and builds a multi-dimensional driving feature system. On this basis, a four-module Driving-Style-Aware Adaptive Transfer (DST-AdaTrans) learning framework is designed. The framework leverages CNN-Transformer to denoise trajectory sequences and extract steady driving preferences, utilizes multi-head attention to infer scenario-matched personalized driving behaviors, introduces dynamic weight fusion to balance scene and individual features, and realizes cross-user knowledge sharing through preference-aware dynamic fusion and cross-user knowledge transfer. Comparative experiments on four real traffic datasets demonstrate that the proposed method reaches an overall determination coefficient R2 > 0.95 with average MAPE only 2.25%. For sparse long-tail drivers, the prediction error is reduced by more than 28% compared with optimal baselines. Ablation studies further verify the collaborative optimization effect of each module, offering complete theoretical and algorithmic support for accurate personalized EV energy prediction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhou et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: