Automated sperm morphology classification can reduce the subjectivity and workload of manual microscopic assessment, but limited benchmark data and subtle morphology-related visual differences remain important challenges. This study proposes a domain-specific ConvNeXt-Tiny-based framework for sperm morphology classification on the SMIDS benchmark. The framework combines Hi-LabSpermMorpho-based domain-specific pretraining, multi-scale feature extraction, attention-guided feature refinement, class-balanced sampling, test-time augmentation, MixUp, label smoothing, focal-loss-based optimization, and supervised contrastive learning. Domain-specific pretraining was compared with ImageNet initialization, and the framework was examined through cumulative ablation, component-removal experiments, and matched-condition architecture comparisons. The best configuration, combining Hi-LabSpermMorpho pretraining with 10× augmented training data, achieved a patch-level average accuracy of 92.73%, numerically the highest among the evaluated configurations and backbones. In matched-condition architecture comparisons, the differences between the proposed framework and EfficientNetV2-S, Swin-T, and domain-pretrained BEiT-Base were not statistically significant. The full training configuration significantly outperformed the baseline configuration under 5× augmentation, whereas the component-removal experiments did not establish the necessity of each individual component. Because the held-out test folds were also used for checkpoint selection, the reported accuracies are subject to selection bias and cannot be regarded as independent test estimates; accordingly, all comparisons should be regarded as exploratory. These findings suggest that domain-specific pretraining can support sperm morphology classification, although independent validation is required.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gül et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: