Why the study?
The effect of attribution psychological adjustment combined with graded exercise rehabilitation nursing on elderly patients with chronic heart failure was unclear.
Does attributional psychological adjustment combined with graded exercise rehabilitation improve attribution style, exercise capacity, and cardiac function in elderly patients with chronic heart failure?
RCT (n=67)
Random number table method
No
Does attributional psychological adjustment combined with graded exercise rehabilitation improve attribution style, exercise capacity, and cardiac function in elderly patients with chronic heart failure?
Absolute Event Rate: 337.81% vs 299.48%
p-value: p=0.021
A structured program of attributional psychological adjustment and graded exercise significantly enhances exercise tolerance, cardiac function, and positive cognitive coping in elderly heart failure patients over a short-term 4-week period.
Supports combined attributional-psychological and graded-exercise nursing for elderly HF; extends prior rehab evidence to include cognitive coping strategies.
摘要: 目的 探讨归因心理调适联合分级运动康复护理对老年慢性心力衰竭(CHF)患者的护理效果。 方法 选取2024年1月—2024年12月在南京医科大学第四附属医院治疗的67例老年CHF患者,以随机数表法分为对照组(34例)与研究组(33例)。对照组采用常规护理,研究组采用归因心理调适联合分级运动康复护理,两组均持续干预4周。比较两组归因方式、6 min步行距离及心功能恢复情况。 结果 干预前,两组内外、稳定、整体评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);干预后,两组内外、稳定、整体评分均高于干预前,且研究组高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。干预前,两组6 min步行距离比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);干预后,两组6 min步行距离均高于干预前,且研究组高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。干预前,两组左心室舒张末期内径(LVEDD)、左心室收缩末期内径(LVESD)、左心室射血分数(LVEF)水平比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);干预后,两组LVEDD、LVESD水平均低于干预前,且研究组低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);干预后,两组LVEF水平均高于干预前,且研究组高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。 结论 归因心理调适联合分级运动康复护理有助于改善老年CHF患者归因方式,延长6 min步行距离,改善心脏功能。
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
陆 et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in Chronic heart failure (n=67). Attributional psychological adjustment combined with graded exercise rehabilitation nursing vs. Routine nursing (health education, psychological counseling, medication/dietary guidance, daily slow walking 15-20 min/day) was evaluated on 6-minute walking distance at 4 weeks (p=0.021).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: