To map the available evidence on neurological monitoring in neonatal ECMO and to derive from it an evidence-based nursing-care model that translates monitoring findings into concrete bedside nursing actions across the ECMO trajectory. A JBI scoping review (PRISMA-ScR) searched PubMed, BVS, ScienceDirect, Scopus, Web of Science and grey literature (February–April 2025). Included: studies in English, Spanish or Portuguese (1991–2025) on neuromonitoring in term or late-preterm neonates (≤28 days) on ECMO; two reviewers screened and extracted data independently. Twenty studies were included: 8 reviews, 7 observational, 2 pilot, 2 case series, 1 guideline. Reported modalities: cranial ultrasound (40 %), aEEG (40 %), EEG (35 %), NIRS (35 %), brain MRI (25 %), head CT (20 %), transcranial Doppler/biomarkers (10 %). Intracranial haemorrhage, ischaemic injury and seizures dominated; recurrent risk factors were prematurity, carotid cannulation, coagulopathy, venoarterial configuration and low birthweight. Only two studies described nursing care. The proposed model is organised by the three ECMO phases (pre-cannulation, during ECMO and post-decannulation), each specifying the clinical objective, core monitoring actions, nursing-led tasks and escalation steps. The findings suggest increasing adoption of multimodal bedside neuromonitoring in neonatal ECMO; nursing-specific evidence remains underreported, and several elements of the proposed model rest on extrapolation rather than direct nursing evidence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Daniel et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: