Key result
Angiotensin receptor blockers and bisartans demonstrate broad polypharmacological GPCR engagement beyond canonical AT1 receptors in computational models, suggesting opportunities for therapeutic repurposing.
Why the study?
The structural requirements in the N-terminal domain of the angiotensin antagonist sarmesin for receptor blockade were not fully understood.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Analogues of the competitive angiotensin antagonist [Sar1,Tyr(ME)4]angiotensin II (sarmesin) with modifications at the N-terminus have been prepared by the solid-phase method and purified by reversed-phase HPLC. Substitution of the Sar1 residue of sarmesin with N,N-dimethyl-Gly, N-ethyl-Gly, aminoisobutyric, (methylamino)isobutyric, aminocaproic, and oxamic acids gave analogues that had the following respective antagonist activities (pA2) in the rat isolated uterus assay: less than 6, 6.9, 5.5, 6.0, less than 6, and 5.3. The additional substitution of Ile for Phe at the C-terminus of the latter four peptides gave pA2 values of 7.1, 5.1, less than 5, and 5. Substitution of the Arg2 residue of sarmesin with Nle or Sar abolished antagonist activity. These data emphasize the stringent and discriminating structural requirements in the N-terminal domain of sarmesin that endow this analogue with its antagonist properties and suggest the presence of defined steric constraints in this region of the molecule during receptor blockade.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Matsoukas et al. (1988) conducted a review in Hypertension, cardiovascular diseases, and drug repurposing. Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) and bisartans was evaluated. Angiotensin receptor blockers and bisartans demonstrate broad polypharmacological GPCR engagement beyond canonical AT1 receptors in computational models, suggesting opportunities for therapeutic repurposing.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: