Key result
Transradial catheterization impairs radial artery endothelial function with persistence lasting for months.
Why the study?
Persistent endothelial dysfunction after transradial coronary catheterization may limit the use of the radial artery as a conduit during CABG surgery.
Meta-Analysis
Standardized Mean Difference: -0.53 (95% CI -0.93–-0.13)
p-value: p=0.01
BACKGROUND: Following cardiac catheterization using radial artery (RA) access, persistent endothelial dysfunction may limit the use of RA as a conduit during coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. We reviewed published literature to investigate the effects of transradial coronary catheterization on RA endothelial function. METHODS: . A random effects model was used to calculate the pooled estimate for standardized mean difference (SMD). Meta-regression analysis was used to explore predictors of change in RA endothelial function following catheterization. RESULTS: In all studies, a significant reduction in endothelium dependent response was observed post-catheterization (SMD = -0.53, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.93 to -0.13, P = 0.01) and a marginal, non-significant, reduction in endothelium independent response (SMD = -0.38, 95%CI: -0.77, 0.01, P < 0.059). In controlled studies, using the contralateral RA as a control, a significant impairment in endothelial function was confirmed (SMD = -6.26, 95%CI: -9.71 to -2.81, P < 0.0001), while the change in endothelium-independent response was not significant (SMD = -4.46, 95%CI: -13.3 to 4.37, P = 0.32). In meta-regression analysis male gender (z = 2.36, P = 0.018) and increasing time following catheterization (z = 2.62, P = 0.009) were associated with less RA endothelial dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: Transradial catheterization impairs endothelium dependent vasodilatory properties of the cannulated RA, which do not recover even several months post-catheterization. Non-recovery of vasomotor function of cannulated RAs may limit their use as arterial grafts during CABG surgery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Antonopoulos et al. (2017) conducted a meta-analysis in Patients undergoing cardiac catheterization. Transradial coronary catheterization vs. Contralateral radial artery or baseline was evaluated on Change in radial artery endothelium dependent response post-catheterization (SMD -0.53, 95% CI -0.93 to -0.13, p=0.01). Transradial catheterization significantly impairs endothelium dependent response of the cannulated radial artery (SMD -0.53; 95% CI -0.93 to -0.13; P=0.01), which does not recover for months.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: