Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
There is a significant clinical need for additional, safer therapies in Giant cell arteritis to reduce relapse risk and lower the serious systemic side effects associated with long-term glucocorticoids.
Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is a chronic inflammatory vasculopathy of the medium and large-sized arteries including the external carotid branches, the ophthalmic, vertebral, subclavian, and axillary arteries, as well as thoracic aorta. Severe granulomatous vasculitis, with profound T cell and macrophage activation and infiltration into the otherwise immunoprivileged vascular wall, results in occlusion of vascular lumen leading to ischemic symptoms, such as loss of vision in ca. 15% of patients. Dissection and aneurysm formation, especially in the aorta also occur. Although very long-term high-dose glucocorticosteroid treatments are used in controlling the inflammation to alleviate symptoms, they are associated with complications, and when glucocorticoids are gradually reduced, disease flares occur frequently. Thus, glucocorticoid sparing regimens including methotrexate as well as biologics such as tocilizimab or abatacept have been tested to further reduce risk of relapse and lower serious systemic side effects. A need for additional potentially safer therapies is very evident.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tomasz Jan Guzik (2018) conducted an editorial in Giant cell arteritis.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: