Key result
Reduced antero-posterior thoracic diameter alters myocardial strain, frequently mimicking subclinical myocardial disease.
Why the study?
Reduced myocardial strain is frequently interpreted as subclinical myocardial dysfunction, but extracardiac mechanical factors may influence strain even without structural heart disease.
Does integrating thoracic morphometry into the interpretation of myocardial strain improve diagnostic specificity and reduce misclassification of subclinical myocardial disease in patients without overt structural heart disease?
Does integrating thoracic morphometry into the interpretation of myocardial strain improve diagnostic specificity and reduce misclassification of subclinical myocardial disease in patients without overt structural heart disease?
Accounting for thoracic geometry and extrinsic mechanical determinants when interpreting myocardial strain can improve diagnostic specificity and prevent the misdiagnosis of subclinical myocardial disease.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Strain reductions warrant caution as possible extracardiac effects of thoracic geometry; leaves open need for adjusted reference values in future studies.
Myocardial strain imaging has become an established tool for detecting subtle abnormalities in cardiac mechanics, and reduced strain is frequently interpreted as evidence of subclinical myocardial dysfunction. However, myocardial deformation reflects not only intrinsic myocardial properties but also the mechanical environment in which the heart operates. Emerging evidence suggests that extracardiac factors, particularly thoracic geometry and reduced antero-posterior (A–P) thoracic dimensions, may substantially influence global and regional strain even in individuals without overt structural heart disease. This narrative review examines the evidence supporting an extrinsically mediated myocardial deformation phenotype across different anatomical and physiological models, including pectus excavatum, mitral valve prolapse, healthy pregnancy, and obesity. A recurring feature is the preferential impairment of basal and, to a lesser extent, mid-ventricular deformation with relative preservation of apical mechanics, potentially generating a mechanical phenocopy of relative apical sparing. These abnormalities may reflect true mechanical constraint, measurement-related effects, or their combination, while intrinsic and extrinsic mechanisms may coexist. Thoracic morphometry may therefore provide valuable context when unexpectedly reduced strain is encountered despite preserved conventional cardiac structure and function. The A–P thoracic diameter can be readily measured from the parasternal long-axis view, while the modified Haller index provides a more comprehensive, radiation-free characterization of thoracic conformation. Rather than equating abnormal strain with abnormal myocardium, myocardial deformation should be interpreted within a multiparametric and mechanistic framework integrating regional strain distribution, conventional cardiac findings, clinical probability, and the mechanical environment surrounding the heart. Accounting for these factors may improve diagnostic specificity and reduce the misclassification of extrinsically mediated strain abnormalities as subclinical myocardial disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sonaglioni et al. (2026) conducted a review in Subclinical myocardial dysfunction. Extracardiac factors (thoracic geometry) was evaluated. Extracardiac factors, particularly reduced antero-posterior thoracic dimensions, can substantially influence myocardial strain and mimic subclinical myocardial disease without structural heart disease.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: