Purpose To compare CT- and MRI-based bone marrow (BM_CT and BM_MRI) dose-hematologic toxicity (HemTox) correlations and identify dosimetric constraints for HemTox mitigation, including hypofractionated 44Gy/20F. Methods Pooled data of IMRT/VMAT planning were analysed from 45Gy/25F (single-institute EMBRACE-II cohort without BM-sparing and conventional fractionation (CVRT) arm of HYPOCx-iRex trial with BM-sparing) and hypofractionated 44Gy/20F from HYPO arm of HYPOCx-iRex trial. BM volumes included pelvic and lumbosacral bones within PTV level (femora excluded). BM_CT covered whole bone with cortices; BM_MRI covered iso-to-hyposignal T1/T2 as active marrow surrogate. BM dose parameters were correlated with CTCAEv5.0 grade (Gr) ≥2 and Gr≥3 HemTox by Mann-Whitney U-test and Probit analysis to identify effective dose associated with 10% toxicity probability (ED10). Results 68 patients analysed from EMBRACE-II (n=28), CVRT (n=19, 45Gy/25F), HYPO (n=21, 44Gy/20F). BM dose reduction was achieved in both HYPOCx-iRex arms. Gr≥2 HemTox were CVRT 68%, HYPO 67%, vs EMBRACE-II 79% (P=0.62). Gr≥3 HemTox: HYPO 24% vs. CVRT 11% and EMBRACE-II 18% (P=0.61). Significant BM_CT and Gr≥3 HemTox correlations were with ED10s of V20Gy 74%, V25Gy 480 cc, V30Gy 360 cc, and V35Gy 235 cc. BM_MRI and Gr≥2 HemTox correlations were identified exclusively in HYPO with ED10s of V25Gy 39% and Dmean 24 Gy. Conclusion Both CT- and MRI-based BM sparing showed potential for reducing HemTox. Proposed constraints with significant dose-response correlation with practical adaptation for both 45Gy/20F and 44Gy/20F were BM_CT V20Gy <70%, V25Gy <450 cc, V30Gy <300 cc, V35Gy <200 cc; and the more stringent constraints for hypofractionation 44Gy/20F were BM_MRI V25Gy <45% and Dmean <25 Gy. The trade-off PTV strategy may create the low-dose fall-off space enabling these stricter constraints and warrants prospective Phase III validation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Prasartseree et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: