This study evaluates the cradle-to-grave environmental performance of polypropylene (PP) kitchenware in the United Kingdom (UK), addressing critical gaps in understanding how material choices, global supply chains, domestic recycling, and consumer use-phase practices interact. Four scenarios were assessed using life cycle assessment (LCA) modelling: virgin PP (vPP) manufactured in China and Germany, recycled PP (rPP) produced in the UK, and a 50:50 vPP–rPP blend. Environmental impacts evaluated using the ReCiPe 2016 Midpoint (H) and IPCC 2021 GWP100 showed that under the modelled scenarios, UK-produced rPP reduces global warming potential (GWP) by about 53% compared with imported vPP, and by 22% compared with UK-manufactured vPP from Germany, driven by avoided virgin polymer production, the absence of long-distance shipping and end-of-life recycling. Toxicity-related impacts revealed trade-offs associated with recycling processes. The rPP product reduced terrestrial ecotoxicity and human non-carcinogenic toxicity by approximately 36% and 16% relative to imported vPP, demonstrating rPP’s potential to reduce toxicity-related impacts. Consumer use-phase practices (routine household dishwashing) contributed substantially to lifecycle impacts, becoming the dominant life cycle stage (30-64% of GWP) as material-related impacts were reduced. The study demonstrates that the environmental performance of consumer plastics requires integrated consideration of material systems efficiency, geography, supply-chain arrangements, recycling infrastructure, and consumer behaviour. Such an approach can promote circularity in polymer value chains, with the potential to generate substantial environmental, economic, technical and social benefits.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jaramillo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: