As climate change continues to intensify atmospheric moisture demand across the American Southwest, predicting where wildfires cause severe vegetation mortality remains a major challenge. New thermal and optical harmonized satellite products provide emerging opportunities for evaluating how pre-fire vegetation moisture and water stress influence fire severity compared to other variables. We modeled continuous Relativized differenced Normalized Burn Ratio (RdNBR) for 45 wildfires that burned in the 2019 and 2020 fire seasons using random forest to compare Harmonized Landsat–Sentinel-2 vegetation indices, ECOSTRESS (ECOsystem Spaceborne Thermal Radiometer Experiment on Space Station) evapotranspiration and evaporative-stress metrics, Daymet pre-fire weather variables, LANDFIRE fuels attributes, and topographic predictors across five cumulative pre-ignition windows from 1 week to 3 months before ignition. Despite exceptional drought and anomalous fire-weather conditions, low-severity fire was common over the study period. Integrated models outperformed individual product-family models, indicating that fire severity was best explained by combined antecedent weather, terrain, fuels, vegetation type, and vegetation-moisture predictors. Temperature, elevation, solar radiation, vapor pressure, and HLS Normalized Difference Moisture Index (NDMI) were among the most consistent predictors. NDMI was the most consistent HLS plant-moisture metric, but vegetation moisture alone did not explain fire severity. Canopy cover was also important in woodlands and forests. Models using data from shorter pre-ignition windows outperformed longer pre-fire window models. They varied in performance among vegetation types, with the strongest vegetation-specific performance in forests and woodlands. These findings show that emerging high-resolution satellite products can help characterize pre-fire vegetation conditions and improve fire-risk assessments, especially when integrated with short-term antecedent weather, landscape moisture, and terrain data.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Poulos et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: