Purpose The study investigates the association between work-life integration and innovative work behavior, while examining job stress and job satisfaction as mediating variables. Design/methodology/approach A quantitative survey was conducted among employees from various industries. The data were analyzed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) and Artificial Neural Networks (ANN). The study was grounded in the Work-Home Resources model, Job Demands-Resources model, and Affective Events Theory. Findings The findings disclose a network of negative correlations, indicating that poor work-life integration is associated with higher stress and lower job satisfaction, which are linked to impaired innovation. Practical implications It contributes a higher-resolution, multidimensional understanding of how affective and cognitive strains undermine the innovation in collectivist work environments. Originality/value While existing literature mainly highlights the benefits of work-life integration, it rarely addresses the negative aspects, particularly in non-Western contexts. The empirical research explores both partial and sequential mediation of stress and satisfaction in this relationship.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tran et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: