Interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome is a heterogeneous chronic condition with variable guideline-based diagnoses and treatments. Herein, we compared the guidelines of the American Urological Association, European Association of Urology, and Canadian Urological Association to identify discrepancies and develop a practical framework. A structured narrative synthesis of the three guidelines was conducted alongside selected peer-reviewed studies and expert consensus. Diagnostic and treatment approaches were compared and reconciled using a phenotypic framework. The Canadian Urological Association adopts phenotype-based management, the European Association of Urology supports European Society for the Study of Interstitial Cystitis subtyping, and the American Urological Association emphasizes individualized non-tiered care. Phenotype-aligned consensus supports endoscopic therapy for Hunner lesion (HL) disease and pelvic floor therapy for myofascial dysfunction, while cystoscopy timing, glycosaminoglycan therapy, neuromodulation, botulinum toxin, and central sensitization strategies vary. A phenotype-based framework comprising HLs, bladder-centric non-HLs, pelvic floor dysfunction, and systemic or central sensitization may harmonize divergent diagnosis and treatment guidelines.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kravchick et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: