Background: Indoor (household) air pollution is a leading global environmental health risk and remains highly prevalent in rural India, where reliance on solid biomass fuels, suboptimal ventilation and indoor tobacco smoke coexist. Community-level data from northern West Bengal are scarce, and we found no published study on the subject from Cooch Behar district. Objectives: To assess the status of indoor air pollution and to describe the household and behavioural determinants associated with it in a rural community of Cooch Behar district. Methods: A community-based, descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted among 117 households (484 residents) in the rural area of Guriahati, Cooch Behar, over April 2026, using a pre-designed, pre-tested, interviewer-administered schedule covering socio-demographic, housing, fuel use-and-exposure and health domains. Households resident for more than six months that provided consent were included; locked houses and refusals were excluded. Socio-economic status was graded by the updated B.G. Prasad scale (January 2025). Data were summarised as frequencies, percentages, mean, median and range; reporting follows the STROBE statement. Results: Most respondents had primary-level education (63.2%) and belonged to the lower-middle (41.9%) or middle (29.9%) socio-economic class. Liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) was the main cooking fuel in 71.8% of households, yet 27.0% still used biomass exclusively or in combination; visible cracks/slits in the kitchen (67.5%), absent chimney/exhaust (63.2%), absent cross-ventilation (72.6%), overcrowding (61.5%) and wall dampness/mould (48.7%) were common. Indoor smoking occurred in 31.6% of households. Respiratory symptoms were reported by 29.9% and eye/skin/headache irritation by 45.3%; 13.7% reported a gritty ocular sensation while cooking, and 26.5% reported illness in the preceding two weeks. Conclusion: Despite predominant LPG adoption, fuel stacking, poor kitchen ventilation, structural deficiencies and indoor smoking sustain a substantial indoor air pollution burden, mirrored by a high prevalence of respiratory and irritative symptoms. Programmes promoting exclusive clean-fuel use, improved kitchen design and ventilation, and reduction of indoor smoking are warranted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Debnath et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: