To compare bilateral vertical jump performance outcomes after post-activation performance enhancement (PAPE) protocols compared with standard warm-up in youth female basketball players. Participants ( n = 14; age = 13.60-16.61 years; body height: 161.02–190.10 cm; body mass: 55.30–80.70 kg) completed four protocols in a randomized crossover design: (i) control condition (raise–activate–mobilize–potentiate warm-up strategy, RAMP), (ii) RAMP + 9 s of isometric mid-thigh pull (IMTP), (iii) RAMP + squat jumps (SJ, 3 sets × 4 repetitions), (iv) RAMP + countermovement jumps (CMJ, 3 sets × 4 repetitions). The CMJ performance was assessed at baseline, 1 min, 5 min and 9 min following each protocol. Outcomes included jump height, peak power, and reactive strength index-modified (RSIm). Relative maximal isometric strength was measured using the IMTP before the experimental protocols. Compared with RAMP (linear mixed-effects model), additional conditioning activities (IMTP, SJ, CMJ) did not improve CMJ height, CMJ peak power, or CMJ RSIm (all p > 0.05) at 1 min, 5 min, or 9 min post-protocols, irrespective of relative maximal isometric strength. Compared with RAMP, addition of PAPE-intended protocols did not improve vertical jump performance in youth female basketball players, irrespective of relative maximal isometric strength.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jiang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: