Background Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is the most frequent malignancy in children. The XRCC6 and XRCC7 genes play a key role in the nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ) repair process and may influence susceptibility to ALL. The aim of this study is to evaluate the polymorphisms XRCC6 -61 C > G (rs2267437) and XRCC7 6721G > T (rs7003908) in children with ALL. Materials and methods Genomic DNA was extracted from the buffy coat from whole blood samples of patients. Genotyping of XRCC6 -61 C > G and XRCC7 6721G > T polymorphisms was performed by PCR followed by restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) using specific restriction enzymes ( BanI and Pvu II ). Results In this investigation significant associations were discovered between XRCC6 -61 C > G genotypes CC ( P = 0.006) and CG ( P = 0.01) with ALL patients. It is important to note that while the CC genotype association remained significant after Bonferroni correction ( P < 0.01), the CG genotype association was nominal (P between 0.01 and 0.05) and should be interpreted with caution. XRCC7 6721G > T genotypes GT ( P = 0.02) and TT ( P = 0.05) were significantly associated with ALL in males and females, respectively. In ALL patients with B-Cell subtype, XRCC6 -61 C > G genotypes CC ( P = 0.04), GC ( P = 0.05), and C allele ( P = 0.05) showed significant associations. XRCC7 6721G > T genotypes GT ( P = 0.003) and TT ( P = 0.05) were also significantly associated in B-Cell ALL. Significant associations were observed for XRCC6 -61 C > G genotype CC ( P = 0.04) and C allele ( P = 0.03) in ALL patients with favorable cytogenetic abnormalities. Conclusions In conclusion, our findings suggest that the XRCC6 -61 C > G and XRCC7 6721G > T polymorphisms may be associated with susceptibility to pediatric ALL, with potential lineage-specific and cytogenetic context-dependent effects. However, given the exploratory nature of our subgroup analyses and the statistical limitations, these results should be interpreted cautiously. Large-scale, multi-center studies with functional validation are needed to confirm these associations and elucidate the underlying mechanisms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ramzi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: