Most conversational AI systems are strictly reactive, responding only when prompted and remain-ing dormant between user sessions. However, in human relationships, initiating contact serves as afundamental social signal of attention, shared memory, and care. In this paper, we present Liliana, anLLM-based persona agent deployed in a live Discord community that autonomously determines when,to whom, and about what to initiate conversation. Our approach relies on three coupled mechanisms:(1) a simulated inner life, implemented via a scheduler that maintains ongoing agent activities anddaily rituals (e.g., morning reports and nightly diaries) to provide contextual reasons for reachingout; (2) relationship-tiered memory, which tracks persistent per-user state (relationship tier, mood,and a topic ledger) to govern conversational tone, initiation frequency, and social boundaries; and(3) artifact-grounded proactivity, through which the agent creates small digital works (micro-gamesand seeded generative art), shares playable links, solicits user feedback, classifies responses, anddeploys code fixes in a closed loop. We report the system architecture and preliminary telemetryfrom a first-week in-situ deployment in a small private community (N = 4 recurring users). Earlyobservations show a 77% response rate within a 12-hour window (n = 13 messages, largely drivenby interactions with the developer) and an 80% topic-grounding rate among measurable messages(n = 5). We also document practical deployment failure modes, including cross-user mood con-tamination and text-to-speech hallucinations caused by decorative punctuation, alongside the ethicalguardrails required for proactive companion agents.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ardifa Rizky Saputra (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: