One shaking table model test with a uniform-length geogrid layout was reproduced numerically for validation, followed by FLAC 3D analyses of 14 full-scale cases with uniform-length and stepped layouts. The test showed a rotation-dominated facing response and migration of the largest monitored settlement from the near-facing region toward the geogrid-end region. Numerical results revealed three deformation stages, from near-facing localization through propagation into the reinforced backfill to middle-geogrid-dominated deformation, accompanied by downward migration of the geogrid high-strain zone. Geogrid length had little influence on maximum settlement at 0.05–0.20 g. At 0.30–0.60 g, settlement became concentrated near the geogrid terminations, and differences among geogrid-length cases became pronounced. At 0.50 g, increasing geogrid length from 0.60 H to 1.50 H , where H denotes the wall height, reduced maximum facing displacement and maximum settlement by 14.5% and 42.2%, respectively. Stepped layouts redistributed settlement between the short- and long-geogrid termination regions, producing single- or multi-peak profiles. With maximum surface settlement as the primary criterion, no stepped layout showed a clear advantage at 0.10 g. At 0.30 and 0.50 g, SL-3, comprising three upper 0.60 H -long layers and 22 lower 1.00 H -long layers, produced the lowest maximum settlements among the stepped layouts investigated.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: