Public relations practitioners increasingly turn to artificial intelligence (AI) bots and agentic systems to enhance decision-making, build campaigns, and support stakeholder research. The growth in AI use, however, reflects pressures of neoliberalism influencing everyday practice. Neoliberalism is an ideology that embodies market ideals and a sense of technological inevitability. Within neoliberalism, practitioners may believe they are exercising a degree of autonomy in decision-making, while actually navigating a field pre-structured by market logic and efficiency goals. This article leans on primary theorists Foucault and Bourdieu to explore these AI practices. Interviews with practitioners ( N = 22 ) indicated that neoliberal patterns actively circulate within practitioner AI deployments. They are made apparent in narratives around AI as compulsory to remain competitive, as a mode of self-optimization, and as an efficiency and productivity multiplier. Yet findings revealed the importance of field dispositions (e.g., professional judgment, context, responsibility) within practitioners’ neoliberal habitus. These dispositions reflect the need for a unified approach — fusing human oversight, responsible risk management, and formalized governance — that may bolster professional work. This article concludes that, amid the absence of regulatory frameworks, field dispositions serve an important, even necessary, role for public relations AI implementation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kyle Harris (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: