To clarify the distribution patterns and interaction mechanisms of the in situ stress field, microstructures, and fractures and to provide geological support for efficient coal-bed methane (CBM) development in the Zhengzhuang Block, this study investigates the No. 3 and No. 15 coal seams. Using Anderson’s in situ stress classification theory, we quantitatively characterize in situ stress distribution, microfracture development, and microstructural features through injection-falloff tests, hydraulic-fracturing microseismic monitoring, logging interpretation, and core analysis to systematically explore their coupling mechanism. Vertically, in situ stress increases linearly with burial depth: reverse-strike-slip stress regimes occur above 700 m, strike-slip regimes occur at 700–900 m, and normal-faulting regimes occur below 900 m. Planarly, the No. 3 coal seam exhibits high-north–low-south stress, whereas the No. 15 seam shows high-west–low-east stress; the maximum horizontal principal stress generally trends NE-NEE. Fracture development is structurally controlled with correlations among the relevant parameters, and the No. 3 seam shows superior fracture development concentrated within tectonically active zones. Five microstructural units are identified using three-dimensional modeling with distinct petrophysical properties; steep-slope zones display the greatest parameter discreteness. Coupling obeys the principal stress-dominant, structure-carrier, and coal-rock-response principles. Eleven coupling modes are proposed for the No. 3 seam and seven for the No. 15 seam. The steep-slope–high-Poisson-ratio–strike-slip-stress mode is most conducive to coordinated fracture growth. This work reveals the structure–stress-fracture coupling mechanism for high-rank coal reservoirs and provides a reference for fracturing-scheme optimization and coalbed-methane exploitation in analogous Qinshui-Basin settings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: