Background/Objectives: Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is a life-saving treatment for many hematological disorders, but demand for unrelated donors continues to outpace donor-registry growth. Voluntary blood donors are a strategic population for donor recruitment, yet their HSCT knowledge and attitudes remain understudied. This study examined these and their relationship with sociodemographic characteristics, blood donation behaviors, and each other. Methods: This cross-sectional, descriptive study was conducted with 300 voluntary blood donors aged 18–64 years attending a blood transfusion and apheresis center in Istanbul, Türkiye, between June and October 2025. Face-to-face interviews used a researcher-developed, content-validated Donor Information Form (scale-level content validity index = 0.96; Kuder–Richardson-20 = 0.828 for knowledge and 0.863 for attitude). Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, t-tests, ANOVA, Pearson correlation, and linear regression. Results: Mean knowledge and attitude scores were low (31.85 ± 21.82 and 34.98 ± 26.63 out of 100, respectively). Healthcare professional status, prior HSCT awareness, and previous stem cell donation were each associated with significantly higher knowledge and attitude scores (all p < 0.001), with the largest effect observed for previous donation experience on attitude (d = 1.92). Knowledge and attitude were strongly correlated (r = 0.705, p < 0.001), and knowledge predicted attitude (R2 = 0.496, p < 0.001). Although 29.3% of participants had considered stem cell donation, only 1.7% had ever donated—a gap that also reflects the need to be matched with a recipient. Conclusions: Knowledge and attitudes regarding HSCT among voluntary blood donors were generally insufficient, with a marked gap between donation intention and actual behavior. Knowledge strongly predicted attitude. Nurse-led education at blood donation encounters, combined with simplified donor-registry enrollment, may help expand the pool of registered stem cell donors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Demirkol et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: