Shore-power demand in ports is highly dependent on vessel arrivals, departures, berthing duration, and vessel-type differences. These operating features make conventional aggregated load models insufficient for coordinated scheduling. This paper proposes a two-stage robust scheduling model for a port distribution network–multi-microgrid system considering vessel-behavior-driven shore-power load uncertainty, dynamic shore-power pricing, and hybrid hydrogen–battery storage. By combining vessel-type classification, vessel-level parameterization, arrival/departure perturbations, and microgrid-level aggregation, a shore-power load model and its uncertainty representation are developed to capture the overlapping berthing effect of multiple vessels and the time-varying uncertainty of shore-power demand. Dynamic shore-power pricing is used to better reflect practical port operation, while a hybrid hydrogen–battery storage system is incorporated to leverage the complementary characteristics of fast-responding batteries and long-duration hydrogen storage, effectively smoothing multi-timescale power fluctuations, facilitating efficient wind power accommodation, and enhancing the intertemporal regulation flexibility and economic efficiency of the port microgrid. The proposed model is solved through a hierarchical ATC–C&CG framework, which coordinates the distribution network and microgrids and optimizes recourse decisions under worst-case scenarios. Case studies show that the total social cost is 20,632.50 CNY, the served shore-power energy reaches 7078.64 kWh, and no load shedding or renewable energy curtailment occurs. Comparative results indicate that the proposed uncertainty model can describe practical port operation disturbances, dynamic shore-power pricing improves shore-power revenue without reducing the service level, and hybrid hydrogen–battery storage enhances microgrid intertemporal regulation flexibility under wind power fluctuations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: